22.3.2012 | 22:44
Five reasons why Iceland should adopt the Canadian dollar
forseti Íslands | |||||
forseti Íslands |
Five reasons why Iceland should adopt the Canadian dollar Fyrst birt í Globe and Mail 05. marz 2012.
![]() The idea of Iceland adopting the Canadian dollar isnt as nutsy as it might seem to some. Indeed, says Justin Wolfers, a prominent U.S. economist, if Iceland really wants to do it, Canada should go for it. And if we dont, maybe the Aussies will. It also appears theres nothing to stop the Icelanders from doing it on their own, by the way. The suggestion, which has been tossed around in some quarters in Iceland over the past several months, picked up steam late last week when Canadas ambassador to the tiny nation, Alan Bones, said Ottawa is open to talking about it if Iceland makes the request.
Mr. Bones had actually prepared to take it further, and was planning to deliver a similar message Saturday to a conference on Icelands currency, the krona. But, as The Globe and Mails Barrie McKenna reported, Canadas Foreign Affairs and International Trade Department pulled the plug at the last minute. Coincidentally, that happened just a few hours after my colleagues story was published online, picked up by other media and flashed around the world via Twitter. Canadian officials said Ottawa wont talk about the currencies of other countries (though that didnt seem to be an issue when the G7 intervened to stem a surge in the yen a year ago) and that it wouldnt have been right to make such comments at a political event, in this case one held by Icelands opposition Progressive Party. I agree it wasnt the venue for it, particularly given that Icelands government is officially preparing to join the 17-member euro zone, but it does seem clear that someone somewhere has been talking about this. Its highly unlikely that Mr. Bones went rogue. Iceland, of course, was the original poster child of the meltdown, suffering a banking collapse, an economic mess and capital controls. An independent currency for a country with the population of the size of a decently sized Canadian city was always going to be a problem, said Sebastien Galy, senior currency strategist at Société Générale.
Should that new currency be the loonie, as its known in Canada?
Mr. Wolfers thinks the Australian dollar would be a better fit for Iceland. But from Canadas perspective, it would be a no-brainer, the associate professor of business and public policy at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania told me.
This followed his comments Friday on Twitter, to which Australian MP Andrew Leigh, a former economics professor, responded that, indeed, Iceland would be better off adopting the Aussie dollar. So maybe we can get a competition going. Mr. Wolfers was referring to what is known as seigniorage, which is how Canada could benefit should Iceland actually ever ditch the krona for the loonie. Im not talking about a currency union here, just Iceland using the loonie. Here are five things to consider: 1. Seigniorage. This is the biggie, if a bit complex. Seigniorage is the difference between the cost of printing a currency and its value. As the Bank of Canada explains it, its the difference between the interest the central bank reaps on a portfolio of government securities, in turn basically the same amount as the value of outstanding bank notes, and what it costs to issue, distribute and replace the bills. On its website, the central bank uses the example of a $20 bill, which has an average lifespan of three years and is the most commonly used. If it invests the proceeds of issuing that note in a government security that yields interest of 5 per cent, the bill yields $1 a year. Producing that bill costs 9 cents. Given the three-year lifespan, it costs an average of 3 cents a year to produce the note. Add 2 cents a year to distribute it, and the annual cost is 5 cents, which means revenue for the central bank of about 95 cents a year for each $20 bill thats out there. More than $50-billion has been circulating at any given time, though that can and does change. Generally, the central bank says, it reaps about $2-billion a year. Some is used for general expenses - $366-million in 2009 and the rest goes to government coffers. Given Icelands small size its population is just 320,000 and the fact that its people have embraced electronic banking, were not talking about a seigniorage windfall here. But Canadas Finance Minister Jim Flaherty is looking to get his hands on whatever he can.
So if there are no strings attached, why not? Or, as Mr. Wolfers put it, referring to Iceland, as long as youre a bastard, its all profit 2. A stable currency. Iceland could of course benefit from a devalued currency. Instead it would get a strong, stable currency that has been something of a haven during this post-crisis period of uncertainty. While strong, exporters at least know what to expect. Consider, too, that the Canadian dollar is liquid. The krona was "blasted through smithereens and very few banks can trade [it] in anything else than very small amounts," Mr. Galy noted. The dollar (CAD/USD-I1.01-0.007-0.69%)has been hovering around par with its U.S. counterpart and is expected to remain there, at least through the end of this year. Im not sure Ontario Premier Dalton McGuinty would agree, but Mr. Galy believes that the Bank of Canada has held interest rates below where they should be to hold the loonie down and give exporters more time to adjust to the currencys strength. So thats at least something for Iceland if you take that view. This soft approach means that capital may be increasingly misallocated at too low a rate (e.g. potentially housing), he said. The more German approach, familiar to many German communities in Canada, is to get down and fix the productivity issue, irrespective of any short-term pain. There is a fine balance between the easy and hard way, we must all tackle whether in Iceland, Europe or Canada. 3. Respected central bank. Iceland would of course have no say in monetary policy, but it would have a currency overseen by a very strong central bank and governor, who led Canada out of the recession admirably. Mark Carney is also respected on the global stage, having recently been named to head up the Financial Stability Board.
4. Fiscal, economic stability. Iceland has no reputation in the wake of its banking collapse. Who would you prefer at that point, a euro zone crippled by recession and a two-year-old debt crisis, or Canada? With Canada, you get a stable, if lukewarm, economic outlook, a government thats still rated triple-A, and a fiscal standing to die for (if youre Greece or Portugal). And, we can count. 5. Our glowing hearts. For Iceland, do not underestimate friendship in this post-crisis era of currency manipulation and mounting trade tensions. Were a wonderful people, theyre a wonderful people. Weve got a beautiful country, theyve got a beautiful country. True, it gets cold in Canada in the winter, but remember were talking about Iceland. >>><<< |